Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Smith

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 29, 1939No. Crim. 3248PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

This is a motion to dismiss an appeal from (1) an order granting probation, and (2) an order denying a motion for a new trial.

These are the essential facts:

May 3, 1939, defendant was found guilty of violating section 501 of the Vehicle Code. May 9, 1939, defendant made a motion for a new trial, which was denied but he was permitted to file an application for probation and the time for the hearing on his application for probation and for pronouncing judgment and sentence was set for May 19, 1939. Thereafter the matters were regularly continued for hearing to and including June 2, 1939, on…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. NooneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  2. People v. HartmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
  3. People v. NeelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  4. Smith v. McCallumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
  5. Hale v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. CarrollNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1963
  2. People v. CrowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  3. People v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  4. People v. AgnewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  5. People v. KauffmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API