Legal Opinion

People v. Crow

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 22, 1941No. Crim. 3521PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

From orders denying defendant's motions for new trials after verdicts of guilty on two counts of manslaughter, defendant appeals.

The ease was tried before a jury and defendant was placed upon probation, no judgments of conviction being entered, but an order suspending proceedings pending the term of probation was made by the trial judge. From this order defendant also attempts to appeal.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (respondent), the essential facts are:

About 7 p. m., September 22, 1940, defendant was driving in an easterly direction on Ocean Avenue in Long…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. People v. PociaskCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  3. People v. DriggsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  4. People v. PollockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  5. People v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. People v. McCoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. People v. BigelowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  3. Daniels v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1966
  4. People v. HolmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  5. State v. CantrellWyoming Supreme Court · 1947

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API