Legal Opinion
People v. Neel
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 17, 1933No. Docket No. 90PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.
The defendant was charged with driving an automobile on a public highway while under the influence of intoxicating liquor and, after a trial before the court without a jury, was found guilty. On his application the court made an order granting him probation upon certain named conditions. The defendant made no motion for a new trial, but gave notice of an appeal from the order granting probation.
Judgment has not been pronounced, the defendant having waived the same by application for probation (People v. De Voe, 123 Cal. App. 233 [11 Pac. (2d) 26]), and the order granting probation, not being…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. De VoeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- People v. NooneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- People v. PatelloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- People v. Von EckartsbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
3Cited by10 opinions
- In Re MarquezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- People v. D'EliaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Samuel Murillo Gutierrez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service at Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- People v. BrockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- People v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.