Smith v. McCallum
California Court of Appeal
APPLICATION for a Writ of Mandate originally made to the District Court of Appeal for the Third Appellate District to compel transcription of stenographic notes for use on appeal. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Application for writ of mandate. It appears from the petition that petitioner was informed against for omitting without lawful excuse to furnish his minor child with necessary food, and on December 14, 1917, he was convicted of the offense charged in the information. The court appointed December 17, 1917, as the time for pronouncing judgment. On said day, and before judgment was pronounced, defendant in open court made and filed a motion and application in arrest of judgment, and also a motion and application for a new trial; thereupon the court, at the request of the petitioner, continued…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ex parte HogeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
- In re AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Hibernia Sav. & Loan Soc'y v. DoranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- State v. CoolidgeWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- People v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Fowler v. GillmanUtah Supreme Court · 1930
- People v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- People v. ShepherdCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936