Legal Opinion

People v. Kauffman

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 9, 1941No. Crim. No. 3464PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

Defendant was found guilty of forgery after trial before the court without a jury. From orders (1) granting him probation and (2) denying his motion for a new trial he appeals.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the people (respondent), the essential facts are:

Defendant, who is known as Harry Lieb or Harry Kauffman, went to the main office of the Bank of America National Trust and Savings Association, obtained a book of blank checks and a signature card. .Thereafter, he took the blank checks to a printer and had the name “Warren F. Clark, M. D., 7046 Hollywood Blvd.” printed…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. BeckerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  2. People v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. GainesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  2. People v. AgnewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API