Legal Opinion

Wall v. Rudolph

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 29, 1961No. Civ. 25158PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAshburn, J.

Plaintiffs Wall and James appeal from an adverse judgment in an action brought for an injunction, declaratory judgment and other relief with respect to certain private roads in the South Mountain area of Ventura County. The lands in question lie immediately south of the Santa Clara River and south and southwesterly of the City of Santa Paula; they are somewhat level along the river and mountain ous to the south. Respondents’ counsel say that this is “an extremely complicated” case and we add, a perplexing one. A careful study of the record 2 discloses as the major legal question that of…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Barham v. BarhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. City of Pasadena v. California-Michigan Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Winslow v. City of VallejoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Hannah v. PogueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Laux v. FreedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Continental Baking Co. v. KatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Red Mountain, LLC v. Fallbrook Public Utility DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  3. Breliant v. Preferred Equities Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Warren v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1971
  5. Cox v. Glenbrook CompanyNevada Supreme Court · 1962

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API