Legal Opinion

W.W.C. Bingo v. Zwierzynski

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided May 22, 1996No. CA 95-541PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Melvin Mayfield, Judge.

This is the second appeal in this workers’ compensation case involving a claimant/appellee and an uninsured employer/appellant. In the first appeal the only issue was compensability. The Commission had held that appellee had sustained a compensable injury and was entitled to workers’ compensation benefits. We affirmed the Commission’s decision. After another hearing the appel lee was awarded temporary total disability benefits from July 11, 1991, through November 16, 1991, medical expenses, and attorney’s fees. On appeal the appellant/employer argues:

I. “WHETHER OR NOT…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Clark v. Peabody Testing ServiceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  2. Bearden Lumber Co. v. BondCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1983
  3. Linthicum v. Mar-Bax Shirt Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1987
  4. State v. ShawNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Morrow v. Mulberry Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Oak Grove Lumber Co. v. HighfillCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998
  2. White v. Frolic FootwearCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1997
  3. Goodwin v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001
  4. Rudick v. Unifirst Corp.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998
  5. Family Dollar Stores, Inc. v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API