Legal Opinion

White v. Frolic Footwear

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided October 1, 1997No. CA 96-1533PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judith Rogers, Judge.

This is an appeal from the Workers’ Compensation Commission’s decision finding that appellant failed to prove that she sustained a compensable injury identifiable by time and place of occurrence. On appeal, appellant argues that there is no substantial evidence to support the Commission’s decision. We disagree and affirm.

When reviewing a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission, we view the evidence and all reasonable inferences deducible therefrom in the light most favorable to the findings of the Commission and affirm that decision if it is supported by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gansky v. Hi-Tech EngineeringSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  2. Johnson v. American Pulpwood Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1992
  3. Southern Steel & Wire v. KahlerCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1996
  4. W.W.C. Bingo v. ZwierzynskiCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1996

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. High Capacity Products v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998
  2. American Greetings Corp. v. GareyCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998
  3. Goyne v. CRABTREE CONTRACTING CO., INC.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2009
  4. Freeman v. Con-Agra Frozen FoodsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000
  5. Prock v. Bull Shoals LandingCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2012

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API