Legal Opinion

Rudick v. Unifirst Corp.

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided January 28, 1998No. CA 97-611PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

D. Franklin Arey, III, Judge.

This appeal arises from the Workers’ Compensation Commission’s denial of benefits to the appellant, Brenda Ann Rudick. The Commission affirmed and adopted the administrative law judge’s opinion; the ALJ found that a rocking motion made by appellant six times per minute to perform her job was not sufficiently rapid to constitute a “rapid repetitive motion” under Ark. Code Ann. § 11-9-102(5)(A)(ii) (a) (Supp. 1997). Appellant contends that the Commission’s decision is not supported by substantial evidence, and that it is erroneous as a matter of law. We reverse and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lay v. United Parcel ServiceCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1997
  2. Baysinger v. Air Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1996
  3. Kildow v. Baldwin Piano & OrganCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1997
  4. W.W.C. Bingo v. ZwierzynskiCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1996
  5. Daniel v. Firestone Building ProductsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1997

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Patterson v. Frito Lay, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1999
  2. International Paper Company v. Ronald L. StewardCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2024
  3. Carlat v. Ark. Highway & Transp. Dep'tCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018
  4. Gates Corp. v. FriendCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API