Clark v. Peabody Testing Service
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
John A. Fogleman, Justice.
This claim arises from the death of William Robert Clark, aged 38, on the job site where he was employed by appellee, Peabody Testing Company. The circuit court affirmed the Workmen’s Compensation Commission’s denial of the claim. Appellant asserts four points for reversal. We find no reversible error.
Point No.
THE CIRCUIT COURT ERRED IN AFFIRMING THE COMMISSION’S OPINION BECAUSE SUCH OPINION REFLECTS THE FULL COMMISSION GAVE WEIGHT TO THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE’S OPINION.
Appellant’s argument on this point is based upon these elements: The commission stated, in its…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Herron Lumber Company v. NealSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
- Barksdale Lumber Co. v. McAnallySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
- Craddock's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- Swan v. WilliamsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
- Purdy v. LivingstonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by131 opinions
- Bearden Lumber Co. v. BondCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1983
- Wright v. American TransportationCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1986
- Arkansas State Highway & Transportation Department v. BreshearsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
- Geo Specialty Chemical, Inc. v. ClinganCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000
- Linthicum v. Mar-Bax Shirt Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1987
126 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.