Saif Corp. v. Bryant
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtKistler, J.
The Workers’ Compensation Board found that claimant’s workplace injury was the major contributing cause of the need for treatment of her combined condition. Employer petitions for review of the Board’s order. We reverse and remand.
Claimant worked as a caregiver at an assisted living facility. On May 24, 1998, a patient at the facility grabbed claimant from behind by her hair, pulled her neck back, and dragged her down a hallway. On July 1, 1998, employer accepted a cervical sprain as a nondisabling condition. On July 12,1998, claimant went to the emergency room because she had been…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- SAIF Corp. v. NehlCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- SAIF Corp. v. StrubelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- SAIF Corp. v. NehlCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- Asten-Hill Co. v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
- Skochenko v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Boeing Company v. ColeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- Kenimer v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- Armenta v. PCC Structural, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- SAIF Corp. v. PruittCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005