SAIF Corp. v. Strubel
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.
SAIF seeks review of a decision by the Workers’ Compensation Board that set aside SAIF’s denial of claimant’s claim. SAIF contends that the Board failed to apply the proper statutory test for a combined condition and, therefore, that the Board erred as a matter of law. We conclude that the Board applied the proper test and that the Board’s conclusion is supported by substantial evidence. Accordingly, we affirm the Board’s decision.
The administrative law judge (ALJ) found the following facts, which were adopted by the Board. Claimant, along with his wife, is a long-haul truck driver. They work…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Uris v. State Compensation DepartmentOregon Supreme Court · 1967
- Dietz v. RamudaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
- Dietz v. RamudaOregon Supreme Court · 1995
- Valtinson v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
- Freightliner Corp. v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
3Cited by12 opinions
- Columbia Forest Products v. WoolnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- Wise v. Brooks Construction ServicesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Worldmark the Club v. TravisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- Keystone RV Co.-Thor Industries, Inc. v. EricksonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- O'CONNOR v. Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.