Gratz v. Schuler
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court' of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order refusing a new trial. Frank J. Murasky, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLennon, P. J.
In this action the plaintiff sought and recovered damages for fraud and deceit alleged to have been perpetrated upon him by the defendants in the negotiation and consummation of an agreement for the purchase and sale of a picture machine, known as the “Kaiser Panorama,” which the defendants owned and, at the time of the sale, were exhibiting at a place of public amusement in the city and county of San Francisco. The fraud and deceit complained of in the plaintiff’s complaint consisted of the following alleged false representations by the defendants: 1. That the defendants had paid the sum of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bacon v. SouleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- Tarke v. BinghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Ruhl v. MottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Willey v. ClementsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Del Vecchio v. SavelliCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Slaymaker v. Westgate State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1987
- Carpenter v. HamiltonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Tatterson v. KehrleinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Lobdell v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Shearer v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.