Legal Opinion

Shearer v. Cooper

California Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1943No. L. A. 18125PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

— The plaintiff, Douglas G. Shearer, with his wife, commenced an action against the defendant, Charles E. Cooper, to recover damages alleged to have been sustained by reason of false representations in the sale to the plaintiff of real property situated in San Diego County. The plaintiff had judgment for $19,650, interest and costs. The defendant appealed.

On the appeal it is not contended that the evidence is insufficient to support the trial court’s findings that certain false representations were in fact made by the defendant to the plaintiff, and that if relied upon they were material…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Herbert v. LankershimCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Feckenscher v. GambleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Carpenter v. HamiltonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  4. Dow v. SwainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Eichelberger v. Mills Land & Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1908

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Bagdasarian v. GragnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. City of Salinas v. Souza & McCue Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Forte v. NolfiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  5. Van Meter v. Bent Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1956

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API