Legal Opinion
Willey v. Clements
California Supreme Court
Decided January 28, 1905No. L.A. No. 1607PublishedCited by 16 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
HARRISON, C.
Action for rescission and to set aside certain instruments of transfer executed between the plaintiffs and the defendant.
In January, 1902, the plaintiff Lulu K. Willey was the owner of certain real estate in Los Angeles, which she subsequently conveyed to the defendant in exchange for a tract of land in Tulare County conveyed to her by him. She seeks by this action to rescind the transaction upon the ground that she was induced to make the exchange by reason of certain false and fraudulent representations made to her by and on behalf of the defendant. The plaintiff Warner E.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Calmon v. SarrailleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Bank of Woodland v. HiattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
3Cited by16 opinions
- Brokaw v. Black-Foxe Military InstituteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Frank Pisano & Associates v. TaggartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Vogelsang v. WolpertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Hunt v. L. M. Field, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1927
- Scott v. Delta Land & Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1922
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.