Legal Opinion

Del Vecchio v. Savelli

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 16, 1909No. Civ. No. 543PublishedCited by 11 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Frank J. Murasky, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.

This action was brought to recover damages for alleged false and fraudulent representations made by defendant to plaintiff, with respect to two barber-shops in San Francisco, in the course of negotiations resulting in a sale of an interest therein by defendant to plaintiff.

The cause was tried before a jury, which returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, and assessed the damages at the sum of $450. Judgment was entered accordingly, and this appeal is taken by defendant within sixty days thereafter.

The facts of the case briefly told are these: The plaintiff who was himself not a barber,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cottrill v. KrumSupreme Court of Missouri · 1890
  2. Davis v. ButlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Markel v. MoudyNebraska Supreme Court · 1881
  4. United States v. Southern Colorado Coal & Town Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Colorado · 1883
  5. Griffing v. DillerNew York Supreme Court · 1892

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. French v. FreemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Schied v. Bodinson Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1947
  3. McMahon v. GrimesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Gratz v. SchulerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
  5. Karapetian v. CarolanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API