In Re Day
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Per curiam
This is an attorney disciplinary matter. After a hearing, the Commission on Lawyer Conduct concluded respondent committed misconduct and recommended a public reprimand. Neither the Office of Disciplinary Counsel nor respondent except to the recommended sanction.
Matter I
At the hearing, Attorney to Assist Disciplinary Counsel (ATA) Donald C. Coggins, Jr., testified he mailed a letter to respondent requesting respondent contact him for an appointment. Coggins testified respondent did not respond. Respondent testified he did not remember receiving Coggins’ letter, but agreed he was responsible…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In the Matter of TreacySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982
- Matter of YarboroughSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
- Matter of MooreSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
- In the Matter of AckerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
- Matter of BallardSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re MartinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
- In Re DaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004