Legal Opinion

Matter of Ballard

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 10, 1994No. 23985PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

In this attorney discipline matter, we impose a definite suspension from the practice of law for a period of one year with reinstatement contingent upon reimbursement of the injured clients’ losses consistent with this order and compliance with all other requirements imposed by Rule 407, SCACR, the Rules of Professional Conduct.

DISCUSSION

Three separate grievances were filed against Mr. Ballard (“Respondent”). The Respondent is also charged with failing cooperate with the Board of Grievances.

A. Grievances filed:

1. The Wells Matter

In May 1991, the Respondent closed the sale of Mr. Wells’…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In the Matter of TreacySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982
  2. In the Matter of LempesisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  3. In the Matter of BrunerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
  4. In the Matter of FousheeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1988
  5. In the Matter of HaddockSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Matter of MooreSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  2. In Re RastSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  3. Matter of HollerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  4. In Re DaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  5. In Re MatsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API