Legal Opinion

In Re Martin

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided September 20, 2010No. 26881PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

In this attorney disciplinary matter of admitted misconduct, we find the appropriate sanction is a public reprimand.

In 2003 and 2004, Respondent Eric Reed Martin conducted three real estate transactions in which he failed to follow proper procedures. In response to the first two complaints, ODC and Respondent entered a Deferred Discipline Agreement that required Respondent to obtain a Law Office Management Advisor and meet with that advisor for a thorough and ongoing review of Respondent’s law office management practices. Respondent failed to comply with the terms of the Agreement, and the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re ThompsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  2. In Re JohnsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  3. Matter of TootleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  4. In Re SimsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
  5. In Re DaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Eric Reed MartinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
  2. In the Matter of Sara Elizabeth SmootSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API