Legal Opinion

In Re Day

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 12, 2004No. 25841Published

1Per curiam

This disciplinary action arises from two separate matters in which Daniel Day (respondent) failed to (1) enforce a client’s divorce decree granting her title to a piece of marital property and (2) respond to his client’s request to amend his post-conviction relief (PCR) petition. The Commission on Lawyer Conduct (Commission) recommended that this Court impose a sanction of an admonition. We sanction respondent with a public reprimand.

Factual/Procedural Background

This Court sanctioned respondent with a public reprimand in November 2002 for his general neglect of various legal matters. In re…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In the Matter of TreacySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982
  2. In Re DaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  3. In Re SpellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API