Legal Opinion

Cone v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided January 15, 1915No. 1457PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 36238 (T. D. 34677).

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, Presiding Judge

The merchandise in this case consists of vegetable fibers which are claimed to be free of duty under paragraph 578 of the act of 1909. The assessment was under paragraph 480 for nonenumerated manufactured articles. The report of the appraiser was that “the merchandise consists of piassava, a vegetable fiber, dyed and dressed, used in the manufacture of brushes, returned for duty, as a non-enumerated partially manufactured article.” In answer to another protest, the merchandise was referred to as “vegetable fiber cut into uniform lengths, dressed and dyed and bunched, used in the manufacture…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fenton v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  2. Schoenemann v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1903
  3. United States v. Danker & MarstonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  4. United States v. Continental Color & Chemical Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  5. Salomon Bros. & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Cone v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  2. Cone v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
  3. Balfour, Guthrie & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1940
  4. C. J. Tower & Sons of Niagara, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
  5. American Import Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API