United States v. Maine Central Railroad
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 38383.
1Opinion of the CourtDe Vries, Judge
The merchandise is spruce gum. On importation it was classified and rated for dutiable purposes by the collector of customs at the port of Portland, Me., as a “gum advanced in value or condition” under the provisions of paragraph 27 of the tariff act of 1913, reading:
27. Drugs, such as barks, beans, berries, buds, bulbs, bulbous roots, excrescences, fruits, flowers, dried fibers, dried insects, grains, gums, herbs, leaves, licheDS, mosses, 'roots, stems, vegetables, seeds (aromatic, not garden seeds), seeds of morbid growth, and weeds; any of the foregoing which are natural and uncompounded…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hartranft v. WiegmannSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- United States v. Sheldon & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
- United States v. SalomonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
- United States v. Danker & MarstonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
- Benjamin Iron & Steel Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. StoneCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
- Cone v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
- United States v. Brown & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1920
- United States v. Tower & SonsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919
- United States v. NagaseCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1921
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.