Legal Opinion

Naumes Forwarding Service v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided February 27, 1950No. C. D. 1214PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cline, Judge:

This is a protest against the collector’s assessment of duty on merchandise invoiced as “dry chestnuts shelled” at 12K cents per pound under paragraph 756 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the trade agreement with France, T. D. 48316, as “Chestnuts * * * prepared or preserved in any manner.” It is claimed that the merchandise is entitled to free entry under paragraph 1646 as “Chestnuts * * * not further advanced than crude, dried, or baked.”

The pertinent provisions of the tariff act are as follows:

Par. 756 [as modified by the trade agreement with France, T. D. 48316].…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Danker & MarstonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  2. Roessler & Hasslacher Chemical Co. v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1899
  3. Leber & Meyer v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1904

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hismoco (American) Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1978
  2. Kwan Yuen Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
  3. Ambriola Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950
  4. De Bernardi v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950
  5. Domenico D'Angiola, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API