Legal Opinion

Estate of Ricks

California Supreme Court

Decided August 4, 1911No. S.F. No. 5246PublishedCited by 60 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Humboldt County entered upon an order granting a nonsuit in a contest of a will. G. W. Hunter, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.

The testatrix, by will dated December 36, 1890, devised and bequeathed her estate to two of her sons, the respondent Hiram L. Ricks and Casper S. Ricks, giving to her other son, the appellant here, a nominal legacy. Casper S. Ricks died August 7, 1896. On November 8, 1901, testatrix executed a codicil giving to said Hiram L. Ricks the portion of her estate bequeathed in her will to Casper S. Ricks. Testatrix died November 26, 1903, and on December 1, 1904, her will and the codicil thereto were admitted to probate. On August 28, 1905, the appellant Thomas F. Ricks filed a contest of said will…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of ArnoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Snowball v. SnowballCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  3. De La Cuesta v. CalkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. In Re the Estate of NelsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Estate of BentonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Peterson v. LoganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Estate of PerkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Jenkins v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Estate of BairdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  5. In Re Estate of RelphCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API