Legal Opinion

Field v. Loder, Unpublished Decision (10-28-1999)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 28, 1999No. 74887Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiffs-appellants appeal from the trial court's order granting summary judgment in favor of all defendants in this negligence action. They argue:

I. THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT BECAUSE THE DEFENDANTS OWED A DUTY OF CARE TO THE PLAINTIFF TO EITHER SWEEP AND ILLUMINATE STAIRS, WHICH WERE COVERED WITH FIRE DEBRIS AND SOOT, BEFORE INVITING HIM TO DESCEND THOSE STAIRS IN THE DARK TO RE-LIGHT A FURNACE IN THEIR BASEMENT, OR TO WARN HIM OF THOSE DANGERS.

II. THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT BECAUSE THE DEFENDANTS FAILED TO CONCLUSIVELY PROVE THEIR…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mussivand v. DavidOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Paschal v. Rite Aid Pharmacy, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Simmers v. Bentley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Cafferkey v. Turner Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Eicher v. United States Steel Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API