Legal Opinion
Cafferkey v. Turner Construction Co.
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided January 22, 1986No. 84-1600PublishedCited by 78 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.
The issue presented is whether a general contractor merely by virtue of its supervisory capacity over the worksite owes a duty of care to the employees of a subcontractor engaged in inherently dangerous work.
In Hirschbach v. Cincinnati Gas & Elec. Co. (1983), 6 Ohio St. 3d 206, the syllabus holds:
“One who engages the services of an independent contractor, and who actually participates in the job operation performed by such contractor and thereby fails to eliminate a hazard which he, in the exercise of ordinary care, could have eliminated, can be held responsible for the injury or death of an…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hirschbach v. Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
- Briere v. Lathrop Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1970
- Hanna v. HannaOhio Court of Appeals · 1952
- In re Bell Telephone Co.Ohio Public Utilities Commission · 1954
- Evans v. Whirlpool Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1967
3Cited by78 opinions
- Whitelock v. Gilbane Building Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1993
- Bond v. Howard Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1995
- Sopkovich v. Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
- Michaels v. Ford Motor Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1995
- Best v. Energized Substation Service, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.