Legal Opinion

Cafferkey v. Turner Construction Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 1986No. 84-1600PublishedCited by 78 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.

The issue presented is whether a general contractor merely by virtue of its supervisory capacity over the worksite owes a duty of care to the employees of a subcontractor engaged in inherently dangerous work.

In Hirschbach v. Cincinnati Gas & Elec. Co. (1983), 6 Ohio St. 3d 206, the syllabus holds:

“One who engages the services of an independent contractor, and who actually participates in the job operation performed by such contractor and thereby fails to eliminate a hazard which he, in the exercise of ordinary care, could have eliminated, can be held responsible for the injury or death of an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hirschbach v. Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Briere v. Lathrop Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Hanna v. HannaOhio Court of Appeals · 1952
  4. In re Bell Telephone Co.Ohio Public Utilities Commission · 1954
  5. Evans v. Whirlpool Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1967

3Cited by78 opinions

  1. Whitelock v. Gilbane Building Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Bond v. Howard Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Sopkovich v. Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Michaels v. Ford Motor Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Best v. Energized Substation Service, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API