Legal Opinion

Eicher v. United States Steel Corp.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 2, 1987No. 86-1793PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.

The courts below found that appellants failed to produce sufficient evidence to meet the legal requirements for their cause of action. For the reasons set forth herein, we affirm such determinations.

*249Initially, it is pointed out that appellants offered no verifiable evidence that Eicher was ever exposed to any harmful chemical or gas. All of the events in question occurred outdoors in open spaces. No evidence was adduced as to the chemical composition of the fumes to which appellants assert Eicher was exposed. Appellants did not show that on the date in question such fumes were different from…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hanna v. HannaOhio Court of Appeals · 1952
  2. Davis v. Charles Shutrump & Sons Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Westwood v. Thrifty Boy Super Markets, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1972
  4. In re Bell Telephone Co.Ohio Public Utilities Commission · 1954

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Michaels v. Ford Motor Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Best v. Energized Substation Service, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Emminger v. Motion Savers, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Gross v. Western-Southern Life Ins. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. McClorey v. Hamilton County Board of ElectionsOhio Court of Appeals · 1998

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API