Legal Opinion
Avery v. Abraham
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 9, 1926No. 16132PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMason, J.
The plaintiff in error was plaintiff in the trial court and the defendant in error was defendant, and, for convenience, they will be referred to herein as they there appeared.
The plaintiff alleged that he was engaged in the brokerage business in Bristow and other places in the state of Oklahoma; that he maintained an office with telegraphic wires and market quotations, and that he was a member of the New Orleans Cotton Exchange. That during a period of time from October, 1919, to October 25, 1920, the defendant was engaged in buying and selling cotton for future delivery over the New Orleans…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Drumm-Flato Commission Co. v. EdmissonSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Drumm-Flato Commission Co. v. EdmissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1906
- Kasenberg Et Ux. v. HartshornSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Brooks v. Hinton State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ryan v. SpaniolCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951
- Casselman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1936
- Duncan v. AndersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Haubert v. Navajo Refining Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Occidental Life Ins. Co. v. MintonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.