Kasenberg Et Ux. v. Hartshorn
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Brror from District Court, Atoka County; A. T. West, Judge. Action by J. A. Hartshorn against G. Kasenberg and Maggie Kasenberg, to recover certain personal property. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
ROBERTSON, C.
Defendant in error, hereinafter designated as plaintiff, commenced an action in replevin in the district court of Atoka county on the 25th day of June, 1908, against the plaintiffs in error, who were defendants below, to recover certain specific personal property described in the petition and affidavit. Verdict was returned on the 22d day of December, in favor of the plaintiff, against the defendants. Motion for new trial was filed, overruled, exceptions taken, and the defendants prosecute this appeal to reverse said judgment.
Many errors were assigned in the petition in…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Drumm-Flato Commission Co. v. EdmissonSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Drumm-Flato Commission Co. v. EdmissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1906
3Cited by9 opinions
- Muskogee Electric Traction Co. v. McIntireSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Avery v. AbrahamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Dane v. BennettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Guest v. ShamburgerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Seneca Co. v. DossSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.