Drumm-Flato Commission Co. v. Edmisson
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF OKLAHOMA. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKenna
This is an action brought by defendant in error against plaintiff in error for $8,000, for the conversion of 410 head of cattle. The case was tried to a jury, which returned a verdict for the sum of $7,436.06. The jury also returned with the general verdict answers to special interrogatories which were submitted at the request of the Commission Company. Judgment was entered upon the verdict, which was affirmed by the Supreme Court of the Territory of Oklahoma. This writ of error was then sued out.
The assignments of error assail the sufficiency of the evidence to justify the verdict and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lincoln v. ClaflinSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- District of Columbia v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Drumm-Flato Commission Co. v. Gerlach BankMissouri Court of Appeals · 1904
3Cited by30 opinions
- Grand Trunk Western R. Co. v. HW Nelson Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
- Felix v. Hall-Brooke SanitariumSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
- Thompson Towing & Wrecking Ass'n v. McGregorCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1913
- Bates v. DresserSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.