Duncan v. Anderson
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
ESTES, C.
Parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court, inverse to their o.der here. In her suit against defendant, plaintiff, Anderson, alleged that the Greenfield State Bank was the duly constituted agent of plaintiff for loaning $1,100 of plaintiff’s money then in possession of said bank; that plaintiff drew a check and deposited same to the credit of Duncan, who thus received and used the money; that on December 1, 1923, plaintiff demanded said sum from defendant, and that defendant has wholly failed to pay same; that no express agreement otherwise was made…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- National Bank v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Helm v. MicklesonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Thurlwell v. RabbitSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Avery v. AbrahamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Brooks v. Hinton State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Village of Monticello v. Citizens State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- City of Canby v. Bank of CanbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
- Rottger, Rec. v. Delta Delta Delta Realty Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1933
- Sanders v. First National Bank & Trust Co. of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
- Bowman v. TowerySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.