Legal Opinion

Drumm-Flato Commission Co. v. Edmission

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 5, 1906PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Error from the District Qouri of Woods County; before J. L. Pancoast, Trial Judge. STATEMENT 'OF FACTS. This action was an action brought in the district court of Woods county by E. C. Edmisson against the Drumm-Elato Commission Company, for the wrongful conversion of 410 head of cattle, whereby the plaintiff claims he has sustained damages in the sum of $8,000.00. The issues and the facts in this ease are fully stated in the former decision of this court, in the case of…

Read the full summary

Error from the District Qouri of Woods County; before J. L. Pancoast, Trial Judge. STATEMENT 'OF FACTS. This action was an action brought in the district court of Woods county by E. C. Edmisson against the Drumm-Elato Commission Company, for the wrongful conversion of 410 head of cattle, whereby the plaintiff claims he has sustained damages in the sum of $8,000.00. The issues and the facts in this ease are fully stated in the former decision of this court, in the case of Edmisson v. Drumm-Flato Commission Company, 13 Okla. 440, and need not be restated here. The cause was submitted to a jury,…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

Hainer, J.:

The first error assigned and argued by the plaintiff in error is that there is no substantial evidence in the record to support the verdict. This contention cannot be sustained. A careful reading and examination of the entire record fully convinces us that the plaintiff! established his cause of action by a clear preponderance of the evidence and that the general verdict and the answers to the special questions submitted are abundantly sustained by the evidence.

In the former opinion of this court, Chief Justice Bur-ford, in passing uuon this question, uses…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kesler and Dodson v. CheadleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903
  2. Drumm-Flato Commission Co. v. Gerlach BankMissouri Court of Appeals · 1904
  3. City of Lawton v. McAdamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Landon v. MoreheadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Cox v. SarkeysSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
  3. First National Bank & Trust Co. v. Exchange National Bank & Trust Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1973
  4. Gast v. BarnesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  5. Kasenberg Et Ux. v. HartshornSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API