Brooks v. Hinton State Bank
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from, District Court. Caddo County; Finnic M. Bailey, J udge. Action by P. E. Brooks and another against the Hinton State Bank. Judgment of dismissal and plaintiffs bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtTurnee, J.
On December 22, 1904, P. E. Brooks and H. Flanagan, partners as Brooks & Flanagan, plaintiffs in error, sued the Hinton State Bank, defendant in error, in the district court of Caddo county as in assumpsit for money had and received. After answer and reply filed there was trial to a jury. At the’"close of plaintiffs5 testimony defendant demurred to the evidence, which was sustained, the suit. dismissed and plaintiffs taxed with the costs. After motion for a new trial filed and overruled, plaintiffs bring the ease here, and assign that the court erred in sustaining said motion.
There is no…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Haebler v. . MyersNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Gaines v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Brand v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
- Culbreath v. CulbreathSupreme Court of Georgia · 1849
- Bates-Farley Savings Bank v. DismukesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Helm v. MicklesonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Thurlwell v. RabbitSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Avery v. AbrahamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Cleveland Nat. Bank v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Duncan v. AndersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.