Pulju v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition of Jean Pulju for further review be, and the same is, granted for the limited purpose of reversing the May 5, 1995 order and June 6, 1995 decision of the court of appeals dismissing the appeal. The appeal is reinstated and the matter is remanded to the court of appeals for its consideration and disposition of the merits of the appeal.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Alexander M. Keith Chief Justice
MEMORANDUM
Relying upon its own decision in Mely v. State Farm Ins. Co., 530 N.W.2d 216, 217 (Minn.App.1995), the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Chapman v. DorseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Chapman v. DorseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Willeck v. WilleckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- Mely v. State Farm Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re GlaxoSmithKline PlcSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- Leek v. American Express Property CasualtyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- City of Rochester v. KottschadeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
- Holm v. Casino Resource Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- Marzitelli v. City of Little CanadaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.