Legal Opinion

City of Rochester v. Kottschade

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 7, 2017No. A16-1203PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CHUTICH, Justice.

Appellant City of Rochester (City) sued respondents Franklin P. Kottschade and S.J.C. Properties (collectively SJC) to stop arbitration proceedings after SJC demanded arbitration and an arbitrator determined that the dispute was arbitrable. The district court denied the City’s motion for summary judgment, granted SJC’s motion for summary judgment, and compelled arbitration. Rather than stay the underlying action, as required by Minnesota Statutes section 572B.07(f) (2016), the district court directed the entry of judgment, and judgment was entered. The City appealed.…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Jackson v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
  3. Larson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  4. In Re GlaxoSmithKline PlcSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  5. Schmidt v. Midwest Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Melaas v. Diamond Resorts U.S. Collection DevelopmentNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  2. Woischke v. Stursberg & Fine, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
  3. Byars v. Dart Transit CompanyDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2019
  4. In re the Marriage of: David Gordon Wingad v. Janet Marie WingadCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
  5. In the Matter of the Trust Created Under Agreement by and Between Janet E. Johnson, Settlor, and Paul Johnson, ...Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API