Mely v. State Farm Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
SPECIAL TERM OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge.
FACTS
On March 1, 1995, State Farm Insurance Company filed this appeal from a November 80, 1994, judgment modifying and confirming an arbitration award. The appeal papers indicated appellant had received written notice of entry of the November 30 judgment on December 5,1994., This court questioned whether the appeal was timely. Both parties submitted jurisdiction memoranda. We dismiss the appeal because we conclude it was not timely filed.
DECISION
“Special proceeding” has been broadly defined as a generic term for civil remedies that are not ordinary actions.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Layne-Minnesota Co. v. Regents of the University of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- Chapman v. DorseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Chapman v. DorseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Schuster v. SchusterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
- Township of Honner v. Redwood CountyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Pulju v. Metropolitan Property & CasualtySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- Pulju v. Metropolitan Property & CasualtyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995