Legal Opinion

Drotleff v. Renshaw

California Supreme Court

Decided August 10, 1949No. S. F. 17946PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment for damages for personal injuries suffered in an automobile collision. By its verdict the jury exonerated defendants Charles W. Renshaw and Charles A. Langlais from liability but found in favor of plaintiff as against defendants Harold Dyer and Jack M. Edmonds in the sum of $6,000. The latter two defendants appeal, arguing these points: (1) excessiveness of the damage award; and (2) prejudicial misconduct of plaintiff’s attorney. In addition defendant Harold Dyer urges one further consideration not applicable to his coappellant: that his motion for nonsuit…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Tingley v. Times Mirror Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Gray v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Kittle v. BellegardeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Roedder v. LindsleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Steinbauer v. BondesenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Smith v. Los Angeles Bookbinders Union No. 63California Court of Appeal · 1955
  2. Jensen v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Donovan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Burke v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. Ericksen v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1952

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API