Legal Opinion

Van Antwerp v. City of Detroit

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 25, 1973No. Docket No. 13160PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBronson, P. J.

The trial court ordered that mandamus issue against defendants for the payment of pension benefits to plaintiff from March 30, 1965, to the present with interest therefrom until paid and for benefits accruing in the future. From this decision defendants sought leave to appeal. This Court granted leave and ordered a stay of proceedings below to consider the following issues:(1) Did defendants have the right to terminate pension benefits awarded pursuant to the City of Detroit Policemen and Firemen Retirement System upon plaintiff’s election to the Common Council of defendant city?(2) Is a writ…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Campbell v. Judges' Retirement BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Couper v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Book Furniture Co. v. ChanceMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Pillon v. Attorney GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Brown v. City of Highland ParkMichigan Supreme Court · 1948

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lothian v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Moore v. MarshallMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Lothian v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API