Legal Opinion

Moore v. Marshall

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided January 29, 1985No. Docket 76271PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

As part of her retirement benefits from the Detroit Police Department, appellant receives hospitalization insurance through Bankers Life Company. Upon being elected as a 36th District Court Judge, appellant sought additional hospitalization benefits through Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Michigan. As District Control Unit for the 36th District Court, the City of Detroit denied appellant the additional benefits because sections 16-9-4 and 16-9-8(f) of the city code prohibit duplicate hospitalization and surgical benefits to members of the city’s employee benefit plan, including retired…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Board of County Road Commissioners v. State Highway CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Van Antwerp v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Garian v. City of Highland ParkMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API