Legal Opinion

Lothian v. City of Detroit

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 13, 1982No. 64875, (Calendar No. 7)Published

1Opinion of the Court

414 Mich. 160 (1982)

324 N.W.2d 9

LOTHIAN

v.

CITY OF DETROIT

Docket No. 64875, (Calendar No. 7).

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Argued May 6, 1981.

Decided September 13, 1982.

Donald A. Calkins for plaintiff.

Sylvester Delaney, Deputy Corporation Counsel, and William Dietrich and Michael A. Hurvitz, Assistants Corporation Counsel, for defendant.

COLEMAN, C.J.

In this case, we are asked to decide whether plaintiff's claim for accrued retirement benefits, filed long after the applicable statutory period of limitations had expired, is barred. We hold that plaintiff's claim is barred. Accordingly, we reverse.

I

In…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Bailey v. GloverSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Wood v. CarpenterSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  3. Bell v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
  4. Driscoll v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Lothian v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1982

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API