Pennell v. City of San Jose
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GRODIN, J.
Defendant city appeals, and plaintiffs landlord and association cross-appeal, from a judgment of the Santa Clara Superior Court (i) declaring part of defendant’s rent control ordinance facially unconstitutional and (ii) upholding the constitutionality of the ordinance’s rental unit fee provision. We affirm the latter ruling and reverse the former.
1. The City’s Appeal
In July 1979 the city enacted a rent control ordinance “to alleviate some of the more immediate needs created by San Jose’s housing situation. These needs include but are not limited to the prevention of excessive…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Birkenfeld v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Southern Burlington County N.A.A.C.P. v. Township of Mount LaurelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
- Fisher v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- Fisher v. City of BerkeleySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Butterworth v. BoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Pennell v. City of San JoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- MHC Operating Limited Partnership v. City of San JoseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Sinclair Paint Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Jacks v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
- Apartment Ass'n of L.A. Cty. Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.