Legal Opinion

Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Mashore

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 15, 1908No. 2028, Okla. TPublishedCited by 35 opinions

Error from District Court, Caddo- County; P. E. Gillette, Judge. Action for wages by W. F. Mashore against the Chicago, Eock Island & Pacific Eailway Company. Judgment for plaintiff: was affirmed in the district court, and defendant brings error.

Read the full summary

Error from District Court, Caddo- County; P. E. Gillette, Judge. Action for wages by W. F. Mashore against the Chicago, Eock Island & Pacific Eailway Company. Judgment for plaintiff: was affirmed in the district court, and defendant brings error. On the 5th day of February, 1904, W. F. Mashore,. as plaintiff, filed in the office of Homer A. Arends, a justice of the peace of Caddo county, his bill of particulars against the above-named plaintiff in error, the C., R. I. & P. Ry. Co., in which he alleged that, in the month of September, 1903-, at the special instances and requests of the…

1Opinion of the CourtDuNN, J.

(after stating the facts as above). There are four assignments of error, presented and argued in the brief of plaintiff in error, for our consideration. It appeared on the trial that in September, 1903, the plaintiff, Mashore, filed a verified bill of particulars before the same justice of the peace, in which he sued-the above-named Edward Bitsche for this claim, garnisheeing the railroad company. This fact was proven on the trial, and the. defendant asked the court to give the following instruction, which related thereto:

"You are further instructed that a fact once solemnly stated or…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fé Railway Co. v. EllisSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Missouri v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. Pope v. AllisSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  4. Hunter v. HunterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Millett v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1886

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Zeier v. Zimmer, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
  2. Consolidated Cut Stone Co. v. SeidenbachSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  3. Hawkins v. MattesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Barzellone v. PresleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
  5. Parkhill Truck Company v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API