Legal Opinion

Allen v. Cadwell

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 1884PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from Ingham. (Gridley, J.) Foreclosure bill. Complainant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtOhamplin, J.

This was a bill to foreclose a mortgage given by the defendants Warren W. and Laura A. Cadwell, who are husband and wife, to complainant, to secure the payment of a money obligation (bond) executed by defendants Warren W. and Marvin S. Cadwell, who are brothers. Mary Cadwell, wife of Marvin S. Cadwell, was brought in as a defendant in possession of a part of the mortgaged premises, and is the only defendant who answered. In brief, her answer claims a homestead in lot one, block seventy-three, Lansing, a part of the mortgaged premises; that she had never parted with her interest therein ; and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. McKee v. WilcoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
  2. Russell v. SweezeyMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Damouth v. KlockMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Hommel v. DevinneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Austin v. DeanMichigan Supreme Court · 1879

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Tate v. Pensacola, Gulf, Land & Development Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1896
  2. Phillis v. GrossSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Grand Rapids Chair Co. v. RunnelsMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Hoy v. AndersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Corey v. SmalleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1895

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API