Legal Opinion
State v. Osborne
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 8, 2006No. C1-03-253PublishedCited by 72 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HANSON, Justice.
An Olmsted County jury found respondent Anthony Osborne, Sr., guilty of 28 counts of drug-related offenses. The district court entered judgment of conviction on 23 counts and sentenced Osborne on 21 of those counts, resulting in an aggregate 268-month sentence that included three upward departures. Osborne appealed his conviction and sentence. The Minnesota Court of Appeals affirmed Osborne’s conviction and sentence, and we denied review. After the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- State v. FosterOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- Martinez v. Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- State v. CaulfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. MaurstadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- State v. VanceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- State v. PakhnyukSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2019
- State v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.