Legal Opinion

Cox v. Chicago Great Western Railroad

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 21, 1929No. 27,053PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1 Reported in 223 N.W. 675. Appeal by defendant from an order denying its motion for a new trial.

The case was here before and is reported in 173 Minn. 239,217 N.W. 128. At the first trial the plaintiff obtained a verdict for $15,000. On appeal this court held that the evidence as to the extent and duration of the injuries was unsatisfactory and that the verdict was excessive and appeared to have been given under the influence of prejudice. A new trial was granted on the issue of damages only. On the second trial, on substantially the same evidence, the jury returned a verdict of $16,000. The…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Goss v. GossSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  2. Merrill v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  3. Johnson v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  4. Peterson v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  5. Quinn v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Genzel v. HalvorsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  2. Lundblad v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  3. Kugling v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  4. Forbes v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2006
  5. In re Gen. Motors LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API