Legal Opinion

Kugling v. Williamson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 5, 1950No. 35,114PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Matson, Justice.

In an action for damages for breach of promise to marry, wherein the jury gave plaintiff a verdict for $5,000, defendant made a motion for judgment non obstante or a new trial, which was granted unless plaintiff filed a written remittitur consenting to a reduction of $1,000 in the amount of the verdict. Plaintiff consented to the remittitur, and in consequence thereof defendant’s motion for a new trial stood denied, and from this order of denial defendant appeals.

Plaintiff, of the age of 47 years, immigrated to this country from Germany in 1924 with her husband and one child.…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Ry. Co. v. MoquinSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Kaehler v. KaehlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  3. State v. YoderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
  4. In Re Estate of ForsytheSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  5. Morgan v. MuenchSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Manion v. TweedySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  2. Genzel v. HalvorsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  3. Ossenfort Ex Rel. Ossenfort v. Associated Milk Producers, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  4. Peterson v. PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  5. Lake v. NeubauerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API