Legal Opinion

Alexander D. v. State Board of Dental Examiners

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 13, 1991No. A048932PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

NEWSOM, Acting P. J.

This case concerns the constitutionality of Business and Professions Code section 820, 1 dealing with possible mental incompetency of a licensed dentist.

Statement of Facts and Procedure

Appellant Alexander D., a practicing dentist licensed by the State of California, appeals from an order of the superior court denying his motion for preliminary injunction to enjoin the Board of Dental Examiners (respondent or Board) from ordering him to submit to a psychiatric examination.

On November 28, 1989, appellant was served with an order and petition issued by the Board…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Younger v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Oren Royal Oaks Venture v. Greenberg, Bernard, Weiss & Karma Inc.California Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Smith v. Board of Medical Quality AssuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  4. Curtis v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. In Re AndrewsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Arnett v. Dal CieloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Humenansky v. Minnesota Board of Medical ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
  3. North Dakota Commission on Medical Competency v. RacekNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Kees v. Medical BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  5. Rodriguez v. Department of Real EstateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API