Legal Opinion

Arnett v. Dal Cielo

California Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1996No. S048308PublishedCited by 156 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOSK, J.

Evidence Code section 1157 provides that the records of a hospital peer review committee are not “subject to discovery.” We address *7here the narrow issue whether an investigative subpoena issued by the Medical Board of California as part of its inquiry into the conduct of a physician with an apparent drug problem is “discovery” within the meaning of that statute. The trial court ruled that it is not and ordered compliance with the subpoena, and the Court of Appeal held to the same effect. We agree with those rulings, and therefore affirm the judgment of the Court of Appeal.

The…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. United States v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Harris v. Capital Growth Investors XIVCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by156 opinions

  1. Briggs v. Eden Council for Hope & OpportunityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Reno v. BairdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Elsner v. UvegesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Kibler v. Northern Inyo County Local Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Big Creek Lumber Co. v. County of Santa CruzCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006

151 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API