Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Kees v. Medical Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 9, 1992No. D012304PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TODD, Acting P. J.

Philip Artz Kees, M.D., filed a petition for writ of mandate under Code of Civil Procedure section 1094.5 to review a decision of the Division of Medical Quality of the Board of Medical Quality Assurance (the Board). 2 In the decision, the Board had revoked Kees’s license to practice medicine but stayed the revocation and placed Kees on probation for 10 years subject to certain terms and conditions. The trial court denied the petition for writ of mandate. Kees appeals.

Facts

Kees is a physician who was licensed to practice in this state on December 12, 1983. He was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. White v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. In re BerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. California Housing Finance Agency v. ElliottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Ass'n for Retarded Citizens v. Department of Developmental ServicesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Board of Medical Quality Assurance v. GherardiniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. LandauCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  2. Humenansky v. Minnesota Board of Medical ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
  3. Gray v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  4. Medical Bd. of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  5. Sporich v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API