Legal Opinion

Oren Royal Oaks Venture v. Greenberg, Bernard, Weiss & Karma Inc.

California Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1986No. L.A. 32020PublishedCited by 125 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GRODIN, J.

In this case we must determine what role the statutory “privilege” for statements made in the course of a judicial proceeding (Civ. Code, § 47, subd. 2 [hereafter § 47(2)])1 plays in an abuse of process action. In particular, we must decide whether section 47(2) precludes a court from making evidentiary use of statements made during negotiation sessions in determining whether a defendant in an abuse of process action acted for an improper “ulterior” purpose.

As we shall explain, we conclude that section 47(2) does not bar the evidentiary use of such statements to establish the…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Palma v. U.S. Industrial Fasteners, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Bertero v. National General Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Barquis v. Merchants Collection Assn.California Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Albertson v. RaboffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  5. White v. Western Title InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by125 opinions

  1. Silberg v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Flatley v. MauroCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Rusheen v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Bear Stearns & Co.California Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Crowley v. KatlemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994

120 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API